$10 million Suave hair loss settlement back in court

By Deanna Utroske

- Last updated on GMT

$10 million Suave hair loss settlement back in court
Unilever faced multiple class action suits when consumers using a Suave Professional product reported hair loss and scalp burns. Late last week the Seventh Circuit decided on an appeal from class members dissatisfied with the initial outcome.

The product in question is Unilever USA’s Suave Professionals Keratin Infusion 30 Day Smoothing Kit, which the company recalled in 2012.

“Unfortunately, for some consumers, the Smoothing Kit was a disaster. Its active ingredient, thioglycolic  acid, is extremely corrosive, and if left on long enough, can dissolve the hair and burn the scalp,” ​explains the court in its decision.

Several class actions were filed against the company, claiming breach of warranty, violations of state consumer fraud, violations of deceptive practices law, and unjust enrichment.

Backstory

The cases were consolidated and went into mediation until February 2014, when a settlement was reached.

As noted in this latest decision in the case, the original settlement saw “Unilever USA agree to create two settlement funds: a Reimbursement Fund of $250,000, and an Injury Fund of $10,000,000, for a total of $10,250,000.”

Objection

Tina Martin, the named class objector‐appellant, gave 11 reasons for opposing the settlement. In its decision, the Seventh Circuit distilled them further as:

  • the strength of the class’s case
  • the complexity and expense of further litigation
  • the amount of opposition
  • the reaction of class members to the settlement
  • the opinion of competent counsel
  • the stage of the proceedings
  • the amount of discovery that was completed

Outcome

None of these were sufficient to invalidate the settlement: “We conclude that the district court properly approved the settlement agreement reached in this case, and we thus affirm its judgment,” ​writes the court.

The decision to uphold the original Suave settlement is something of a win for the personal care industry, with several companies not faring so well in the legal arena lately. Oldspice is facing a suit​ from consumers alleging allergic reactions. EOS just settled an allergy-related suit​ with the stipulation that the company enhance product labels.

Avon settled an IP dispute with beautyblender​ over sponge applicator tool sales and marketing. And, of course J&J lost an important suit linking talc to cancer​. 

Related topics Regulation & safety Hair care

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

EuroLock Twist-to-Lock Spray Pump: No Cap No Leaks

EuroLock Twist-to-Lock Spray Pump: No Cap No Leaks

Content provided by Aptar Beauty | 16-Oct-2024 | Product Brochure

Discover the convenience and reliability of EuroLock, the innovative twist-to-lock spray pump designed for today’s fast-paced lifestyle. Manufactured in...

Get up to $500 off IGEN™ Non-GMO Tested Program!

Get up to $500 off IGEN™ Non-GMO Tested Program!

Content provided by SGS Nutrasource | 04-Jul-2024 | Insight Guide

The cosmetics industry has seen unprecedented growth in recent years, and with this growth comes a rising concern for what’s inside our everyday products.

How Nutricosmetics Can Enhance Skin Beauty

How Nutricosmetics Can Enhance Skin Beauty

Content provided by Activ'Inside | 11-Dec-2023 | White Paper

In the ever-evolving realm of nutricosmetics, where inner wellness meets outer beauty, few natural ingredients have captured the spotlight quite like grapes.

Related suppliers